The dirt hat of Michael Massing’s The Resolve summarizes his thesis in bold red words: “Under the Nixon Government, America Had an Powerful Medicine Policy. WE SHOULD RESTORE IT. (Nixon Was Right).” That is a pretty extraordinary declare to make regarding an administration that gained company in big part through the “Southern Technique” that had at their center Nixon’s declaration of a “Conflict on Medications” and whose procedures created the cocaine epidemic that triggered therefore several new concerns 10 years later. At most, I’d agree that the Nixon administration’s pursuit of a fundamentally poor plan involved some useful initiatives which were devalued by every subsequent administration. This is maybe not since Nixon or his closest advisers were right about drug plan but since Nixon was more thinking about international policy problems and his benign neglect of domestic plan permitted several good developments to flower in the midst of the mire of mess and problem that characterized his presidency. دواء

Perceptively concluding that “procedures being created in Washington today keep little relationship from what is occurring on the road,” Massing attempts to show the real aftereffects of drug policy at the street level. However, he does not depend on the epidemiologic evidence or browse the cautious analyses done by analysts like myself who have thoroughly reviewed what’s really happening on the street. As an alternative he depends on the journalist’s normal — and frequently misleading — tool of extraordinary anecdotes.

Massing’s anecdotal situation is shown through the experiences of Raphael Flores and Yvonne Hamilton. Flores operates Hot Point Cares, a drop-in middle for fans in Spanish Harlem. Hot Range Cares, which Flores established in 1970, is essentially only a crowded office in of a normally abandoned tenement where Flores and his team recommend and help lovers who would like to get into treatment. Given the fragmented state of medicine punishment treatment in New York City, and in most other American communities, it’s no simple job to get in touch lovers with suitable attention and actually tougher for connecting them with satisfactory aftercare. Massing produces, “If your Vacation Inn is full, it will at least call the Ramada down the street to see when it has a vacancy. Not two therapy programs”


Yvonne Hamilton is just a crack fan looking to get her life together. Massing identifies her trials and tribulations as she copes with her infection and makes her way through New York City’s treatment non-system. It is an affecting history and well told. The author presents it as a disagreement for treatment and perversely as an argument against decriminalization or legalization. But she is one of the many examples that report that prohibition does not reduce addiction. And changes in her drug problem seem to own less related to the treatment she did get than with changes in her living situation.

Both of these lives provide a touchstone to which his account can later return. The middle next of the guide shifts substantially in tone as Massing chronicles the evolution of the conflict on medications in Washington. All through Nixon’s tenure, the us government used more money on treatment (the “demand” side) than on ending drug trafficking (the “source” side), which he argues generated decreases in equally medicine overdoses and crime rates. As successive presidents felt stress to highlight the “conflict” rather than therapy, he asserts that the amount of serious fans skyrocketed. In the 3rd and last area Massing results to Spanish Harlem, where Hamilton continues a hard struggle to remain drug-free and Flores problems to keep his center afloat and to keep from slipping into dependency himself.

It’s the 2nd part of the guide that’s the heart of Massing’s thesis. It is really a tale that’s common to these folks that are active in the subject of medicine plan and, in addition to scholars, different writers have informed it before — Dan Baum (1996) and Robert Gray (1998) doing so especially properly — but I’ll review (with some facts Massing overlooked or remaining out) the annals of drug policy below Nixon for the reader who is not really acquainted with the story.

In 1968, as Richard Nixon was creating his comeback run for the presidency, he followed the “Southern Technique” that has been the important thing to Republican victories in presidential contests ever since. Because the finish of Reconstruction every Democratic presidential choice have been able to count on the votes of the “solid South” however the Upper Democrats’support for civil rights had been the reason for raising disaffection in the South, as epitomized by Strom Thurmond’s separate run for Leader against Truman in 1948. Then, in 1964, Alabama Governor George Wallace’s quote for the Democratic nomination for President showed that racism won votes in the North along with the South. Nixon desired to get the South, along with racists’votes in the North, without offending more standard Republican voters by an freely racist campaign. The clear answer Nixon and his advisers discovered was to plan against crime, which many Americans quite falsely equated with minorities. So imagine if the crime rate was really suffering, Americans appear to generally genuinely believe that crime is increasing in the same way they appear to generally responsibility it on ethnic or racial outsiders.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter